以下是小昭為大家整理的歷年英語(yǔ)考題（考生回憶版）及答案解析，希望對(duì)即將參加考研的同學(xué)們有所幫助。

Section Ⅱ Reading Comprehension

Part A

Directions:

Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your

answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)

Text 1

People  often complain that plastics  are too  durable.Water bottles,shopping bags,and other trash  litter the planet, from Mount Everest to the Mariana Trench, because plastics are everywhere and don't break down easily. But some plastic materials change over time. They crack and frizzle. They “weep” out additives. They melt into sludge. All  of which  creates  huge  headaches  for  institutions,  such  as museums,  trying to preserve  culturally important objects. The variety of plastic objects at risk is dizzying: early radios, avant-garde sculptures, celluloid animation stills from Disney films, the first artificial heart.

Certain artifacts are especially vulnerable because some pioneers in plastic art didn't always know how to mix ingredients properly, says Thea van Oosten, a polymer chemist who, until retiring a few years ago, worked for decades at the Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands. “It s like baking a cake: If you don’t have exact amounts, it goes wrong. ” she says. “The object you make is already a time bomb.”

And sometimes, it's not the artist's fault. In the 1960s,the Italian artist Picro Gilardi began to create hundreds of bright, colorful foam pieces. Those pieces included small beds of roses and other items as well as a few dozen “nature  carpets”—large  rectangles  decorated  with  foam  pumpkins,  cabbages,  and  watermelons.  He  wanted viewers to walk around on the carpets—which meant they had to be durable.

Unfortunately,  the  polyurethane  foam  he  used  is  inherently  unstable.  It's  especially  vulnerable  to  light damage,  and  by  the  mid- 1990s,  Gilardi’s  pumpkins,  roses,  and  other  figures  were  splitting  and  crumbling.

Museums locked some of them away in the dark.

So van Oosten and her colleagues worked to preserve Gilardi’s sculptures.They infused some with stabilizing and consolidating chemicals.Van Oosten calls those chemicals “sunscreens” because their goal was to prevent further light damage and rebuild worn polymer fibers.She is proud that several sculptures have even gone on display again,albeit sometimes beneath protective cases.

Despite success stories like van Oosten’s, preservation of plastics will likely get harder.Old objects continue to deteriorate.Worse, biodegradable plastics designed to disintegrate, are increasingly common.

And more is at stake here than individual objects. Joana Lia Ferreira,an assistant professor of conservation and restoration at the nova School of Science and Technology, notes that archaeologists first defined the great material ages of human history Stone Age,Iron Age,and so on after examining artifacts in museums.We now live in an age of plastic, she says, “and what we decide to collect today,what we decide to preserve. …will have a strong impact on how in the future we'll be seen.”

21.  According to Paragraph 1,museums are faced with difficulties in______.

[A] maintaining their plastic items

[B] obtaining durable plastic artifacts

[C] handling outdated plastic exhibits

[D] classifying their plastic collections

22. Van Oosten believes that certain plastic objects are ______.

[A] immune to decay

[B] improperly shaped

[C] inherently flawed

[D] complex in structure

23. Museums stopped exhibiting some of Gilardi's artworks to ______.

[A] keep them from hurting visitors

[B] duplicate them for future display

[C] have their ingredients analyzed

[D] prevent them from further damage

24.The author thinks that preservation of plastics is______.

[A] costly

[B] unworthy

[C] unpopular

[D] challenging

25. In Ferreira’s opinion, preservation of plastic artifacts _______.

[A] will inspire future scientific research

[B] has profound historical significance

[C] will help us separate the material ages

[D] has an impact on today’s cultural life

Text 2

As the latest crop of students pen their undergraduate application form and weigh up their options, it may be worth considering just how the point, purpose and value of a degree has changed and what Generation Z need to consider as they start the third stage of their educational journey.

Millennials were told that if you did well in school, got a decent degree, you would be set up for life. But that promise has been found wanting. As degrees became universal, they became devalued. Education was no longer a secure route of social mobility. Today, 28 per cent of graduates in the UK are in non-graduate roles, a percentage which is double the average among OECD countries.

This is not to say that there is no point in getting a degree, but rather stress that a degree is not for everyone, that the switch from classroom to lecture hall is not an inevitable one and that other options are available.

Thankfully, there are  signs that this is already happening, with Generation Z seeking to learn from their millennial predecessors, even if parents and teachers tend to be still set in the degree mindset. Employers have long seen the advantages of hiring school leavers who often prove themselves to be more committed and loyal employees than graduates. Many too are seeing the advantages of scrapping a degree requirement for certain roles.

For those for whom a degree is the desired route, consider that this may well be the first of many. In this age of generalists,  it  pays  to  have  specific  knowledge  or  skills.  Postgraduates  now  earn  40  per  cent  more  than graduates. When more and more of us have a degree, it makes sense to have two.

It is unlikely that Generation Z will be done with education at  18 or 21; they will need to be constantly up-skilling throughout their  career to  stay  employable. It has been  estimated that this  generation,  due to the pressures  of technology, the wish  for personal  fulfilment  and  desire  for  diversity, will work  for  17  different employers over the course of their working life and have five different careers. Education, and not just knowledge gained on campus, will be a core part of Generation Z’s career trajectory.

Older generations often talk about their degree in the present and personal tense: ‘I am a geographer. ’ or ‘I am a classist. ’ Their sons or daughters would never say such a thing; it’s as if they already know that their degree won’t define them in the same way.

26.the author suggests that Generation Z should____

[A] be careful in choosing a college

[B] be diligent at each educational stage

[C] reassess the necessity of college education

[D] postpone their undergraduate application

27.The percentage of UK graduates in non-graduate roles reflect_______.

[A] Millennial's opinions about work

[B] the shrinking value of a degree

[C] public discontent with education

[D] the desired route of social mobility

28.The author considers it a good sign that____.

[A] Generation Z are seeking to earn a decent degree.

[B] School leavers are willing to be skilled workers.

[C] Employers are taking a realistic attitude to degrees.

[D] Parents are changing their minds about education.

29.It is advised in Paragraph 5 that those with one degree should______.

[A] make an early decision on their career

[B] attend on the job training programs

[C] team up with high-paid postgraduates

[D] further their studies in a specific field

30.What can be concluded about Generation Z from the last two paragraphs?

[A] Lifelong learning will define them.

[B] They will make qualified educators.

[C] Degrees will no longer appeal them.

[D] They will have a limited choice ofjobs.

以上是昭昭西醫(yī)考研部分考題（考生回憶版）的展示內(nèi)容，因?yàn)閮?nèi)容較多。小昭已經(jīng)將考題（考生回憶版）全部整理放到附件中（包括答案），請(qǐng)自行點(diǎn)擊下載即可使用。

2022考研英一答案.pdf

免責(zé)聲明：本站所提供的內(nèi)容均來(lái)源于網(wǎng)絡(luò)，如涉及侵權(quán)問題，請(qǐng)聯(lián)系本站管理員予以更改或刪除。